Proponents of the three Californias measure say the state government has become too beholden to special interest groups and unions and needs a fresh start. They also suggest it would function more efficiently broken into three parts.

“This is a chance for three fresh approaches to government,” Draper told the San Francisco Chronicle in April. “Three new states could become models not only for the rest of the country, but for the whole world.”

A poll released April 24 by Survey USA found 72 percent of voters are opposed to California splitting into three states.

Opponents of splitting up California say it would do more harm and cause greater disparity for residents.

“This measure would cost taxpayers billions of dollars to pay for the massive transactional costs of breaking up the state, whether it be universities, parks, or retirement systems,” Steve Maviglio, a spokesman for the opposition group OneCalifornia said via Twitter.

“California government can do a better job addressing the real issues facing the state, but this measure is a massive distraction that will cause political chaos and greater inequality. Splitting California into three new states will triple the amount of special interests, lobbyists, politicians and bureaucracy,” he added.

Source link